uid stringclasses 10
values | dataset_id stringclasses 1
value | jurisdiction stringclasses 3
values | court_level stringclasses 6
values | year int64 2.02k 2.02k | area_of_law stringclasses 10
values | pillar stringclasses 1
value | series stringclasses 1
value | input_statute_age_years int64 5 50 | input_amendment_frequency stringclasses 6
values | input_judicial_reinterpretation_rate stringclasses 3
values | input_social_tech_change stringclasses 10
values | input_legislative_review_signals stringclasses 9
values | input_case_signals stringclasses 9
values | question stringclasses 1
value | ground_truth_label stringclasses 2
values | ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10
values | outcome_signal stringclasses 3
values | early_window_months int64 0 11 | source_citation stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SA-TR-001 | legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,022 | Transport | substantive_law | 1A | 45 | Low | High reinterpretation | Tech changed driving behavior | Law commission review pending | Courts flag outdated wording | Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Age plus reinterpretation and reform signals show drift. | reform_risk | 10 | Synthetic |
SA-TR-002 | legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,019 | Tax | substantive_law | 1A | 5 | Recent updates | Low reinterpretation | Economic context stable | No reform signals | Courts apply text easily | Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Recent statute and stable context remain aligned. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
SA-TR-003 | legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1 | EU | Appellate | 2,018 | Digital | substantive_law | 1A | 20 | Moderate | High reinterpretation | Rapid tech evolution | Consultation underway | Courts stretching definitions | Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Rapid tech change outpaces statute. | reform_risk | 8 | Synthetic |
SA-TR-004 | legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1 | UK | Court of Appeal | 2,016 | Property | substantive_law | 1A | 30 | Periodic updates | Low reinterpretation | Social context stable | No reform push | Courts consistent | Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Updates and stable context preserve coherence. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
SA-TR-005 | legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1 | US | State Court | 2,020 | Cannabis | substantive_law | 1A | 50 | null | High reinterpretation | Market changed drastically | Legislative reform pending | Courts face conflicts | Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Old statute diverges from actual regulated practice. | doctrinal_shift_risk | 9 | Synthetic |
SA-TR-006 | legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1 | EU | Trial | 2,021 | Consumer | substantive_law | 1A | 10 | Recent amendment | Low reinterpretation | Commerce stable | No reform signals | Courts apply normally | Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Recent amendment keeps law aligned. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
SA-TR-007 | legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | AI Regulation | substantive_law | 1A | 35 | null | High reinterpretation | AI tech surge | Policy consultation active | Courts struggle with scope | Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Age and tech change produce mismatch. | reform_risk | 6 | Synthetic |
SA-TR-008 | legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,017 | Environment | substantive_law | 1A | 25 | Moderate | Moderate reinterpretation | Environmental conditions stable | No major reform | Courts stable | Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Moderate updates maintain relevance. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
SA-TR-009 | legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1 | EU | Appellate | 2,022 | Employment | substantive_law | 1A | 40 | Low | High reinterpretation | Gig economy shift | Review underway | Courts diverging | Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | New labor models diverge from statute. | reform_risk | 11 | Synthetic |
SA-TR-010 | legal-statutory-age-obsolescence-trajectory-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,015 | Contract | substantive_law | 1A | 15 | Recent update | Low reinterpretation | Commercial practice stable | No reform | Courts consistent | Is statute still coherent with present conditions. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Statute still fits practice. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.