The dataset viewer is not available for this split.
Error code: StreamingRowsError
Exception: CastError
Message: Couldn't cast
model: string
layers: int64
hidden: int64
n_probes: int64
subspace_k: int64
ablation_layer: int64
mean_base_nll: double
mean_jspace_ablated_nll: double
mean_random_ablated_nll: double
jspace_damage: double
random_damage: double
causal_necessity_nats: double
mean_effrank_frac: double
mean_energy_top8: double
mean_per_layer_influence: list<item: double>
child 0, item: double
jspace_ablated_nll: double
random_ablated_nll: double
per_layer_influence: list<item: double>
child 0, item: double
energy_top8: double
prompt: string
effrank_frac: double
workspace_concepts_by_depth: struct<0: list<item: string>, 4: list<item: string>, 8: list<item: string>, 12: list<item: string>, (... 71 chars omitted)
child 0, 0: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
child 1, 4: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
child 2, 8: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
child 3, 12: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
child 4, 16: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
child 5, 20: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
child 6, 24: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
base_nll: double
to
{'prompt': Value('string'), 'base_nll': Value('float64'), 'jspace_ablated_nll': Value('float64'), 'random_ablated_nll': Value('float64'), 'effrank_frac': Value('float64'), 'energy_top8': Value('float64'), 'per_layer_influence': List(Value('float64')), 'workspace_concepts_by_depth': {'0': List(Value('string')), '4': List(Value('string')), '8': List(Value('string')), '12': List(Value('string')), '16': List(Value('string')), '20': List(Value('string')), '24': List(Value('string'))}}
because column names don't match
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/utils.py", line 147, in get_rows_or_raise
return get_rows(
dataset=dataset,
...<4 lines>...
column_names=column_names,
)
File "/src/libs/libcommon/src/libcommon/utils.py", line 272, in decorator
return func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/utils.py", line 127, in get_rows
rows_plus_one = list(itertools.islice(safe_iter(ds, dataset=dataset), rows_max_number + 1))
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/utils.py", line 478, in safe_iter
yield from ds.decode(False) if ds.features else ds
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 2818, in __iter__
for key, example in ex_iterable:
^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 2355, in __iter__
for key, pa_table in self._iter_arrow():
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 2380, in _iter_arrow
for key, pa_table in self.ex_iterable._iter_arrow():
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 536, in _iter_arrow
for key, pa_table in iterator:
^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 419, in _iter_arrow
for key, pa_table in self.generate_tables_fn(**gen_kwags):
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 343, in _generate_tables
self._cast_table(pa_table, json_field_paths=json_field_paths),
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 132, in _cast_table
pa_table = table_cast(pa_table, self.info.features.arrow_schema)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2369, in table_cast
return cast_table_to_schema(table, schema)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2297, in cast_table_to_schema
raise CastError(
...<3 lines>...
)
datasets.table.CastError: Couldn't cast
model: string
layers: int64
hidden: int64
n_probes: int64
subspace_k: int64
ablation_layer: int64
mean_base_nll: double
mean_jspace_ablated_nll: double
mean_random_ablated_nll: double
jspace_damage: double
random_damage: double
causal_necessity_nats: double
mean_effrank_frac: double
mean_energy_top8: double
mean_per_layer_influence: list<item: double>
child 0, item: double
jspace_ablated_nll: double
random_ablated_nll: double
per_layer_influence: list<item: double>
child 0, item: double
energy_top8: double
prompt: string
effrank_frac: double
workspace_concepts_by_depth: struct<0: list<item: string>, 4: list<item: string>, 8: list<item: string>, 12: list<item: string>, (... 71 chars omitted)
child 0, 0: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
child 1, 4: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
child 2, 8: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
child 3, 12: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
child 4, 16: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
child 5, 20: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
child 6, 24: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
base_nll: double
to
{'prompt': Value('string'), 'base_nll': Value('float64'), 'jspace_ablated_nll': Value('float64'), 'random_ablated_nll': Value('float64'), 'effrank_frac': Value('float64'), 'energy_top8': Value('float64'), 'per_layer_influence': List(Value('float64')), 'workspace_concepts_by_depth': {'0': List(Value('string')), '4': List(Value('string')), '8': List(Value('string')), '12': List(Value('string')), '16': List(Value('string')), '20': List(Value('string')), '24': List(Value('string'))}}
because column names don't matchNeed help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
J-space Reproduction on Qwen2.5-0.5B
Per-probe measurements reproducing Anthropic's "global workspace" / J-space finding on a small open model (Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct, 24 layers, 896 hidden dims), computed on CPU.
This is a reproduction-measurements dataset, not a training dataset. It exists so anyone can check the central claim: a language model does part of its reasoning in a tiny, causally-necessary subspace of its activations, separate from the tokens it emits.
- 📄 Original research: Anthropic, A global workspace in language models · full write-up
- ✍️ The story of this reproduction: bitácora post — "The tiny workspace where a small model does its thinking"
The headline result (12 reasoning probes, mean)
| quantity | value |
|---|---|
| reasoning workspace size (effective rank) | 1.5% of hidden dims |
| future-influence energy in the top-8 SVD directions | 76% |
| reasoning error, model intact | 2.83 nats |
| reasoning error, random 8-dim slice removed | 3.45 nats (+0.62) |
| reasoning error, J-space 8-dim subspace removed | 4.07 nats (+1.24) |
| causal necessity (extra damage from removing the J-space vs a random slice) | +0.62 nats (≈2× the damage) |
Removing the 8-dimensional J-space hurts reasoning roughly twice as much as removing a random slice of the same size — the model genuinely leans on that tiny subspace.
How it was measured (the Jacobian lens)
- Future-influence Jacobian — back-propagate the loss on the model's own continuation to each layer's
activations:
G_l = d(next-token NLL) / d(hidden_l). Each row is the direction that activation pushes future outputs. - Subspace extraction — SVD of
G_l; keep the top-8 right-singular directions = the J-space at that layer. Report its effective-rank fraction and top-8 energy. - Causal ablation — project the J-space out of the residual stream mid-network and measure the reasoning-NLL increase, against a random equal-rank subspace control.
Full method code is included (jspace_advanced.py, jspace_report.py); it runs on CPU in a couple of
minutes. python jspace_report.py regenerates jspace_measurements.jsonl + jspace_summary.json.
Files
jspace_measurements.jsonl— one row per probe:prompt,base_nll,jspace_ablated_nll,random_ablated_nlleffrank_frac,energy_top8(subspace stats)per_layer_influence— future-influence norm per layer (24 values)workspace_concepts_by_depth— logit-lens top tokens at the final position, by depth
jspace_summary.json— the aggregate table abovejspace_advanced.py,jspace_report.py— the exact measurement code
Honest caveats
- One small model, one subspace size, twelve prompts. The causal claim (a tiny, load-bearing reasoning subspace exists) replicates cleanly and robustly. The content is hard to read on a 0.5B model — the logit-lens workspace concepts are noisy and only sharpen in the last layers.
- The original paper's "planning" aspect (future-relevant concepts activating early) is weak here: on this model reasoning mostly resolves in the last few layers.
- The J-space is a diagnostic lens, not an engineering knob — attempts to exploit it (e.g. mixed- precision quantization or as a data-free model-merge fitness) do not work; that's documented separately.
Citation
If Anthropic's finding is what you're citing, cite their paper. If you use these reproduction measurements or the method code, a link back to the bitácora post is appreciated.
- Downloads last month
- 58