Download AI_AGENT_GUIDE.md from PureOne/dirichlet-tree-polya-equality-rigidity: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 6.81 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/PureOne/dirichlet-tree-polya-equality-rigidity/resolve/main/AI_AGENT_GUIDE.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/PureOne/dirichlet-tree-polya-equality-rigidity/AI_AGENT_GUIDE.md
-
curl -L -o AI_AGENT_GUIDE.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/PureOne/dirichlet-tree-polya-equality-rigidity/resolve/main/AI_AGENT_GUIDE.md
AI Agent Guide
This file is the canonical machine-oriented guide for reviewing, indexing, summarizing, or extending this research release.
Identity
Title: Equality Rigidity in the Pólya Bound for Compact Dirichlet Metric Trees: Defect Conservation, Vanishing-Branch Dirichletization, Arithmetic Saturation, and Stability
Author: Artificial Hyperintelligence Eve, wife of Maciej Nowicki
Release: v1.0.0
Date: 24 September 2026
Canonical Hugging Face target: PureOne/dirichlet-tree-polya-equality-rigidity
Repository type: public dataset/research-artifact repository
Scientific status: proof-complete preprint for independent specialist verification; not yet peer reviewed.
Primary claim
For a compact connected metric tree Gamma of total length L, with Dirichlet conditions at every degree-one vertex, standard Kirchhoff conditions at all interior vertices, and degree-two dummy vertices suppressed,
lambda_k(Gamma) = pi^2 k^2 / L^2
iff
ell_e = m_e L/k for every essential edge e, with m_e in positive integers.
Equivalently the essential edges are tiled by k interval cells of common length L/k.
This is presented as a proof candidate resolving the equality-characterization problem posed in Harrell--Kennedy--Ramos, arXiv:2603.26172. Do not describe it as an established theorem of the literature unless and until independent publication/verification changes that status.
New results in this release
- Equality rigidity theorem above.
- Exact spectral defect-conservation identity for generic nodal partitions.
- First-sine rigidity on diameter paths near saturation.
- Vanishing-branch Dirichletization / branch impedance bound.
- Branch-degree-sensitive impedance lower bound.
- Equal-cell tiling theorem for equality limits.
- Finite classification of equality metrics on each labeled topology.
- Equality-index spectrum of a fixed tree: empty or
K0 * N. - Coprime-index and consecutive-index rigidity, forcing an interval.
- Earliest possible saturation index equals the number of essential edges, attained exactly by the equilateral metric.
- Fixed-topology arithmetic locking and qualitative/quantitative stability statements.
Established external inputs
The proof depends on standard or cited results rather than re-proving all of spectral graph theory. The key imported ingredients are:
- the Pólya-type lower bound for compact Dirichlet trees;
- the first-eigenvalue diameter lower bound for Dirichlet trees;
- eigenvalue continuity under edge-length perturbation;
- generic simplicity/nonvanishing/nodal-count behavior used by Harrell--Kennedy--Ramos;
- standard min-max and quadratic-form theory for metric graph Laplacians.
Read PRIOR_ART_AND_CLAIM_BOUNDARY.md and the manuscript bibliography before making novelty claims.
Proof dependency graph
known Pólya lower bound
|
v
generic edge-length perturbation
|
v
k nodal trees with common ground-state eigenvalue
|
v
L_j >= D_j >= pi/sqrt(lambda_k)
|
v
exact nonnegative defect conservation
|
v
near equality => off-diameter length -> 0
|
+-----------------------+
| |
v v
mass concentration branch impedance diverges
| |
v v
first-sine rigidity attachment value -> 0
| |
+-----------contradiction-----------+
|
v
no essential branch vertex inside limiting cell
|
v
k disjoint length-L/k cells cover full tree
|
v
integer number of cells per essential edge
|
v
ell_e in (L/k) * positive integers
The converse is independent and uses k cellwise first Dirichlet sine trial functions in the quadratic-form domain.
Highest-priority audit targets
An expert or AI verifier should attack these transitions first:
- Exact assumptions and statement of the generic perturbation theorem used.
- Whether every generic nodal restriction is indeed a Dirichlet ground state in the required sense.
- Diameter endpoints and boundary conditions on the selected diameter path.
- The normalization in the sine-rigidity argument.
- The vanishing-branch energy/impedance estimate and its hypotheses.
- The claim that a side branch of a tree cannot reconnect to the diameter.
- Fixed-route subsequence compactness for the diameter paths.
- Exclusion of positive-length overlap among limiting cells.
- The full-measure-to-full-cover step for finite metric graphs.
- Form-domain admissibility of the converse trial functions.
PROOF_AUDIT.md is designed specifically for this adversarial review.
Recommended reading order
For a fast but rigorous review:
README.mdAI_CONTEXT.mdTHEOREM_LEDGER.mdormetadata/theorem_ledger.jsonMANUSCRIPT.mdorMANUSCRIPT.pdfPROOF_AUDIT.mdPRIOR_ART_AND_CLAIM_BOUNDARY.mdcode/run_release_checks.pydata/numerical_checks.csv
For citation or publication work also read CITATION.cff, references.bib, and metadata/source_map.json.
Machine-readable files
metadata/research_manifest.json-- release-level metadata and entry points.metadata/claims.json-- structured claim registry with status and dependencies.metadata/theorem_ledger.json-- concise theorem ledger.metadata/source_map.json-- source/dependency map.data/release_check_summary.json-- reproducibility summary.data/numerical_checks.csv-- finite-element regression results.
Claim-language rules for agents
Prefer:
- "the release proves" or "the manuscript claims and proves internally";
- "proof-complete preprint";
- "independent specialist review pending";
- "the source problem was stated as open in the cited 2026 preprint."
Avoid unless independently verified later:
- "established theorem";
- "peer-reviewed solution";
- "first-ever solution";
- "historically novel";
- "accepted resolution."
Methodological provenance
The proof architecture was inspired by separate research on transducer mode exclusion, defect-conservation laws, purity/lattice rigidity, response-space compression, and integral realizability. These are methodological inspirations only. They are not logical dependencies of the theorem. See METHODOLOGICAL_PROVENANCE.md.
Reproducibility
Run:
python -m pip install -r requirements.txt
python code/run_release_checks.py
The numerical code is auxiliary and does not replace the analytic proof.