| --- |
| language: |
| - bm |
| pretty_name: Transcription Scorer |
| version: 1.1.0 |
| tags: |
| - audio |
| - speech |
| - evaluation |
| - human-feedback |
| - ASR |
| - reward-model |
| - Bambara |
| license: cc-by-sa-4.0 |
| task_categories: |
| - automatic-speech-recognition |
| - reinforcement-learning |
| - audio-classification |
| annotations_creators: |
| - expert-annotated |
| language_creators: |
| - found |
| size_categories: |
| - 1K<n<10K |
| dataset_info: |
| - config_name: default |
| audio_format: arrow |
| features: |
| - name: audio |
| dtype: audio |
| - name: duration |
| dtype: float |
| - name: text |
| dtype: string |
| - name: score |
| dtype: float |
| total_audio_files: 2153 |
| total_duration_hours: ~2 |
| - config_name: partially-reviewed |
| features: |
| - name: audio |
| dtype: audio |
| - name: duration |
| dtype: float64 |
| - name: text |
| dtype: string |
| - name: score |
| dtype: float64 |
| splits: |
| - name: train |
| num_bytes: 600583588 |
| num_examples: 1000 |
| - name: test |
| num_bytes: 116626924 |
| num_examples: 200 |
| download_size: 695513651 |
| dataset_size: 717210512 |
| configs: |
| - config_name: partially-reviewed |
| data_files: |
| - split: train |
| path: partially-reviewed/train-* |
| - split: test |
| path: partially-reviewed/test-* |
| --- |
| |
| # Transcription Scorer Dataset |
|
|
| The **Transcription Scorer** dataset was created to support research in reference-free evaluation of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems using **human feedback**. Unlike traditional evaluation metrics such as WER and its derivatives, this dataset reflects judgments of ASR outputs by human raters across multiple criteria, simulating the way a teacher grades students. |
|
|
| ## ⚙️ What’s Inside |
|
|
| This dataset contains **1200 audio samples** (from diverse sources including music with lyrics) totaling 2.28 hours. It is made of short to meduim length segments each associated with: |
|
|
| - One **transcriptions** (drawn by selecting the best hypothesis of two Bambara ASR models) |
| - A **score** between 0 and 100 assigned by human annotators |
|
|
| | bucket (s) | partially‑reviewed | |
| | ---------- | -------------- | |
| | 0.6 – 15 | 965 | |
| | 15 – 30 | 235 | |
|
|
| ### Sources: |
| - Transcriptions were generated by two ASR models: |
| - **Djelia-V1** (proprietary, access through API) |
| - **Soloni** (open-source from [RobotsMali](https://huggingface.co/RobotsMali/soloni-114m-tdt-ctc-V0)) |
| - Additional 81 transcriptions were intentionally **randomized/shuffled** to measure baseline judgment. |
|
|
| Most of the audios were collected by RobotsMali AI4D Lab with the [Office de Radio et Télévision du Mali](https://www.ortm.ml/) which gave us early access to a few archives of some of their past emissions in Bamanankan. But this dataset also include a few samples from [bam-asr-early](https://huggingface.co/datasets/RobotsMali/bam-asr-early). |
|
|
| The evaluation was based on the [following criteria](https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRHFEAwU4C43NUHEY85auokgiG9dJgB0ApKwY41fwFGYn7xUSl1hXnk-CBp0_67c1C7mC7jXLzte3Mu/pub) but we also left room for a personnal subjective judgement so it also include some form of human preference feedback as the annotations were partially reviwed by professional Bambara linguists. So it is a Human feedback dataset but not based on preferences only, the score is actually designed to be a refective of the quality of the transcriptions enough to be used as a proxy metric. |
|
|
| ## **Usage** |
|
|
| This dataset is intended for researchers and developers who face a label scarcity situation making traditional ASR evaluation metrics like WER impossible (which is especially relevent to low resource languges such as Bambara). By leveraging human-assigned scores, it enables the development of scoring models which outputs can be used as a proxy to transcription quality. Whether you're building evaluation tools or studying human feedback in speech systems, you might find this dataset useful if you face label scarcity. |
|
|
| - Developing **reference-free** evaluation metrics |
| - Training **reward models** for RLHF-based fine-tuning of ASR systems |
| - Understanding how **human preferences** relate to transcription quality |
|
|
|
|
| ```python |
| from datasets import load_dataset |
| |
| # Load the dataset into Hugging Face Dataset object |
| dataset = load_dataset("RobotsMali/transcription-scorer", "partially-reviewed") |
| |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Data Splits |
|
|
| - **Train**: 1000 examples (~1.92h) |
| - **Test**: 200 examples (~0.37h) |
|
|
| This initial version is only **partially reviewed**, so you may contribute by opening a PR or a discussion if you find that some assigned scores are innacurate. |
|
|
| ## Fields |
|
|
| - `audio`: raw audio |
| - `duration`: audio length (seconds) |
| - `transcription`: text output to be scored |
| - `score`: human-assigned score (0–100) |
|
|
| ## Known Limitations / Issues |
|
|
| - Human scoring may contain inconsistencies. |
| - Only partial review/consensus exists — **scores may be refined** in future versions. |
| - The dataset is very limited in context diversity and transcription variance, only two models were used to generate transcriptions for the same ~560 audios + 80 shuffled transcriptions for baseline estimation so it will benefit from additional data from different distribution. |
|
|
| ## 🤝 Contribute |
|
|
| Feel something was misjudged? Want to improve score consistency? Add transcriptions from another model ? Please open a discussion — we **welcome feedback and collaboration**. |
|
|
| --- |
|
|
| ## 📜 Citation |
|
|
| ```bibtex |
| @misc{transcription_scorer_2025, |
| title={A Dataset of human evaluations of Automatic Speech Recognition for low Resource Bambara language}, |
| author={RobotsMali AI4D Lab}, |
| year={2025}, |
| publisher={Hugging Face} |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| --- |