Anonymous
Publish finalized GRIP open-source release
7cdd2f2
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
5.55 kB

Test 1 — Closed-Loop Results

Test 1 evaluates accuracy across five reasoning positions, from direct observation (Q1) through counterfactual reasoning (Q5). Results cover 16 models: 10 hosted models and 6 open-weight models.

Comparator note

Hosted-model values use the typed comparator. Open-weight values use the original comparator because their raw responses are not available in this repository for typed re-scoring. Results are internally consistent within each tier but should not be treated as directly comparator-equivalent across tiers.

Accuracy by question position (%)

The mean is each model's overall Test-1 accuracy.

Tier Model Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Mean
Hosted Gemini 3.8 Flash 82.8 76.6 65.3 52.4 67.3 68.9
Hosted Claude Opus 5 80.2 76.0 60.9 47.3 65.4 66.0
Hosted Grok 4.6 67.4 69.3 52.2 38.8 57.6 57.1
Hosted GPT-5.6 Sol 71.4 65.5 50.9 35.9 48.3 54.4
Hosted Claude Sonnet 5 67.1 68.8 50.2 37.7 47.4 54.2
Hosted Muse Glimmer 30B 71.8 57.7 35.6 31.5 42.2 47.7
Hosted DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 67.1 53.5 40.2 30.2 39.7 46.1
Hosted GPT-5.6 Luna 65.2 52.8 39.2 29.1 38.7 45.0
Hosted Perplexity Sonar Pro 64.9 53.1 36.4 24.5 37.1 43.2
Hosted Inkling 58.6 50.3 33.2 27.1 37.1 41.3
Open-weight Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct 56.4 51.5 39.2 30.7 35.8 42.7
Open-weight Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking 58.4 51.3 37.7 26.7 29.5 40.7
Open-weight Molmo2-8B 57.8 51.2 33.7 25.0 32.5 40.0
Open-weight InternVL3.5-8B 52.2 48.8 33.0 21.8 28.9 36.9
Open-weight Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking 38.7 44.4 28.8 19.5 27.4 31.8
Open-weight DeepSeek-VL2-Small 37.1 44.3 27.3 18.0 21.3 29.6

Constant-answer baselines by question position (%)

These baselines are the accuracy obtainable without reading the image, computed from the answer key. They are reported separately because the two tiers use different item samples.

Question position Description Hosted Open-weight
Q1 Direct observation 31.6 32.7
Q2 Spatial relation 44.8 41.9
Q3 Measurement 25.9 23.3
Q4 Multi-step integration 27.5 23.5
Q5 Counterfactual 41.4 41.9
Mean 34.2 32.7

Raw accuracy by reasoning family (%)

Families are ordered by the hosted-tier fleet mean, strongest first. The mean is the domain-count-weighted mean over the nine families and reproduces each model's overall accuracy in the preceding table. Bold marks the strongest family within each model row; underlining marks the weakest.

Tier Model Physical Inductive Analytic Transformational Solid Projective Plane Optical Topological Mean
Hosted Gemini 3.8 Flash 79.4 83.2 79.2 69.7 61.5 68.0 65.0 62.0 57.7 68.9
Hosted Claude Opus 5 77.8 83.2 78.6 64.3 62.1 67.4 65.3 51.4 48.4 66.0
Hosted Grok 4.6 72.8 65.2 64.4 55.2 56.9 51.4 52.1 39.4 40.8 57.1
Hosted GPT-5.6 Sol 63.1 63.2 59.8 53.3 56.6 47.8 51.8 39.4 44.3 54.4
Hosted Claude Sonnet 5 68.3 66.4 58.6 50.6 55.6 47.8 45.0 51.4 40.5 54.2
Hosted Muse Glimmer 30B 58.3 53.2 48.6 42.7 44.5 50.2 50.2 32.4 41.6 47.7
Hosted DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 58.6 58.4 44.8 48.7 40.7 50.2 42.4 35.0 30.7 46.2
Hosted GPT-5.6 Luna 52.8 51.6 47.6 45.7 47.7 38.0 42.6 36.8 30.0 45.0
Hosted Perplexity Sonar Pro 51.0 42.0 38.8 44.6 44.3 40.2 41.8 39.4 30.4 43.2
Hosted Inkling 45.4 36.8 36.4 43.4 46.7 43.8 37.4 35.2 30.5 41.3
Open-weight Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct 46.0 56.0 43.3 39.5 49.3 49.5 36.0 32.7 37.4 42.8
Open-weight Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking 52.7 61.5 31.9 39.1 41.8 53.6 29.3 27.8 32.9 40.8
Open-weight Molmo2-8B 48.4 36.4 32.8 43.0 43.1 42.1 32.1 32.3 31.0 40.1
Open-weight InternVL3.5-8B 46.4 34.9 26.1 33.2 45.2 36.8 31.4 30.0 28.7 37.0
Open-weight Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking 35.9 29.2 16.4 32.1 37.1 39.8 27.3 26.0 28.4 31.8
Open-weight DeepSeek-VL2-Small 29.1 24.6 20.3 28.4 36.6 28.2 29.4 30.6 27.1 29.6

Summary

  • Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the hosted tier at 68.9%, followed by Claude Opus 5 at 66.0%.
  • Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct leads the open-weight tier at 42.7% in the position table and 42.8% in the rounded family table.
  • Accuracy generally declines from direct observation toward multi-step integration, with partial recovery at Q5 for most models.
  • Physical and Inductive reasoning are the strongest hosted-tier families overall; Topological reasoning is generally the weakest.
  • The one-decimal means shown here are transcribed from the supplied result tables. Small 0.1-point differences between tables reflect their reported rounding.