| --- |
| license: cc-by-4.0 |
| task_categories: |
| - tabular-classification |
| - feature-extraction |
| tags: |
| - environment |
| - rivers |
| - pollution |
| - geospatial |
| - europe |
| size_categories: |
| - 100K<n<1M |
| --- |
| |
| # EEA Industrial Emissions - River Proximity Dataset |
|
|
| This dataset links **160,576 industrial facilities** from the European Environment Agency (EEA) to nearby rivers, with **upstream/downstream flow analysis** based on HydroRIVERS network data. |
|
|
| ## Why This Dataset? |
|
|
| Industrial facilities that discharge pollutants into water bodies affect downstream ecosystems and communities. This dataset enables: |
|
|
| - **Impact assessment**: Which communities/ecosystems are downstream of polluting facilities? |
| - **Source tracing**: Where does a facility's water supply come from? |
| - **Regulatory analysis**: Mapping industrial emissions to affected river networks |
| - **Environmental research**: Studying relationships between industry and water quality |
|
|
| ## How It Works |
|
|
| ``` |
| ┌─────────────┐ |
| │ UPSTREAM │ ← Source water (green) |
| │ (5 parts) │ flowing TOWARD facility |
| └──────┬──────┘ |
| │ |
| ───────●─────── ← Split point (closest to facility) |
| │ |
| ┌──────┴──────┐ |
| │ FACILITY │ ← Industrial facility (orange) |
| │ (211m) │ within 1km of river |
| └─────────────┘ |
| │ |
| ┌──────┴──────┐ |
| │ DOWNSTREAM │ → Affected water (red) |
| │ (4 parts) │ flowing AWAY from facility |
| └─────────────┘ |
| ``` |
|
|
| For each facility: |
| 1. Find the closest river segment within 1km |
| 2. Split the river at the closest point |
| 3. Trace **upstream** 10km (source water) |
| 4. Trace **downstream** 10km (potentially affected) |
| 5. Clip water surface polygons to match |
|
|
| ## Dataset Files |
|
|
| ### `river_data_facilities.geoparquet` (2.6 GB) |
|
|
| Main dataset with 160,576 facilities matched to rivers. |
|
|
| | Column | Type | Description | |
| |--------|------|-------------| |
| | `facilityName` | string | Name of industrial facility | |
| | `city` | string | City location | |
| | `countryName` | string | Country | |
| | `EPRTR_SectorCode` | int | Industry sector code (1-9) | |
| | `EPRTR_SectorName` | string | Industry sector name | |
| | `Pollutant` | string | Pollutant released to water | |
| | `Releases` | float | Amount released | |
| | `closest_river_id` | int | HydroRIVERS segment ID | |
| | `distance_to_river_m` | float | Distance to river (meters) | |
| | `river_strahler` | int | Strahler stream order (1-9) | |
| | `river_discharge` | float | Average discharge (m³/s) | |
| | `upstream_segment_ids` | list[int] | Upstream HydroRIVERS IDs | |
| | `downstream_segment_ids` | list[int] | Downstream HydroRIVERS IDs | |
| | `n_upstream` | int | Number of upstream parts | |
| | `n_downstream` | int | Number of downstream parts | |
| | `upstream_line_wkb` | bytes | Upstream river geometry (WKB) | |
| | `downstream_line_wkb` | bytes | Downstream river geometry (WKB) | |
| | `upstream_poly_wkb` | bytes | Upstream water surface (WKB) | |
| | `downstream_poly_wkb` | bytes | Downstream water surface (WKB) | |
| | `geometry` | Point | Facility location (WGS84) | |
| | `closest_river_overlap_fraction` | float | Fraction (0–1) of the closest HydroRIVERS segment's length that falls inside an EU-Hydro `River_Net_p` polygon (± 30 m buffer) | |
| | `closest_river_is_sentinel_visible` | bool | True if `closest_river_overlap_fraction ≥ 0.30` — the closest river segment is wide enough to be detectable in Sentinel-2 | |
| | `n_upstream_sentinel_visible` | int | Number of upstream segments that meet the Sentinel-visibility threshold | |
| | `n_downstream_sentinel_visible` | int | Number of downstream segments that meet the Sentinel-visibility threshold | |
| | `has_sentinel_visible_river` | bool | **Summary flag** — True if any of the closest, upstream, or downstream segments is Sentinel-visible; use this column to filter facilities to those where Sentinel-2 water-quality retrieval is feasible | |
|
|
| ### `river_data_segments.geoparquet` (1.7 MB) |
|
|
| River segments with direction labels (28,434 entries). |
|
|
| | Column | Type | Description | |
| |--------|------|-------------| |
| | `HYRIV_ID` | int | HydroRIVERS segment ID | |
| | `direction` | string | "upstream" or "downstream" | |
| | `ORD_STRA` | int | Strahler stream order | |
| | `DIS_AV_CMS` | float | Average discharge (m³/s) | |
| | `LENGTH_KM` | float | Segment length (km) | |
| | `geometry` | LineString | River segment geometry | |
|
|
| ## Usage |
|
|
| ### Load the dataset |
|
|
| ```python |
| import geopandas as gpd |
| from shapely import wkb |
| |
| # Load facilities |
| facilities = gpd.read_parquet("river_data_facilities.geoparquet") |
| print(f"Loaded {len(facilities):,} facilities") |
| |
| # Example: Find facilities in Germany |
| german = facilities[facilities['countryName'] == 'Germany'] |
| print(f"Germany has {len(german):,} facilities near rivers") |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Extract river geometries |
|
|
| ```python |
| # Get a specific facility |
| facility = facilities[facilities['facilityName'].str.contains('PRECHEZA')].iloc[0] |
| |
| # Parse WKB geometries |
| upstream_line = wkb.loads(facility['upstream_line_wkb']) |
| downstream_line = wkb.loads(facility['downstream_line_wkb']) |
| upstream_poly = wkb.loads(facility['upstream_poly_wkb']) |
| downstream_poly = wkb.loads(facility['downstream_poly_wkb']) |
| |
| print(f"Upstream: {facility['n_upstream']} segments") |
| print(f"Downstream: {facility['n_downstream']} segments") |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Visualize a facility |
|
|
| ```python |
| python visualize_single_facility.py "PRECHEZA" |
| # Opens facility_map.html in browser |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### Visualize multiple facilities |
|
|
| ```python |
| python visualize_facilities_rivers.py |
| # Opens facilities_rivers_map.html with 200 sampled facilities |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Scripts |
|
|
| ### `river_proximity.py` |
| |
| Main pipeline that: |
| 1. Loads EEA facilities, HydroRIVERS segments, and EU-Hydro polygons |
| 2. Builds river network graph from NEXT_DOWN field |
| 3. For each facility, finds closest river and splits at nearest point |
| 4. Traces upstream (BFS) and downstream (linear) within distance limits |
| 5. Clips water surface polygons to match river geometries |
| 6. Outputs geoparquet files |
|
|
| ### `visualize_single_facility.py` |
|
|
| Creates an interactive Folium map for a single facility showing: |
| - Green: upstream river and water surface |
| - Red: downstream river and water surface |
| - Orange marker: facility location |
|
|
| ### `visualize_facilities_rivers.py` |
|
|
| Creates an overview map with sampled facilities and their river associations. |
|
|
| ## Source Data |
|
|
| | Dataset | Source | Usage | |
| |---------|--------|-------| |
| | Industrial Facilities | [EEA E-PRTR](https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/industrial-reporting-under-the-industrial-6) | Facility locations & emissions | |
| | River Network | [HydroRIVERS v1.0](https://www.hydrosheds.org/products/hydrorivers) | River segments & flow direction | |
| | Water Polygons | [EU-Hydro](https://land.copernicus.eu/imagery-in-situ/eu-hydro) | Water surface geometry | |
|
|
| ## Parameters |
|
|
| | Parameter | Value | Description | |
| |-----------|-------|-------------| |
| | `max_distance_m` | 1,000 | Max distance from facility to river | |
| | `upstream_distance_km` | 10 | How far to trace upstream | |
| | `downstream_distance_km` | 10 | How far to trace downstream | |
| | `polygon_buffer_m` | 600 | Buffer for polygon clipping | |
|
|
| ## Statistics |
|
|
| - **Total facilities processed**: 254,027 |
| - **Facilities near rivers**: 160,576 (63%) |
| - **Unique upstream segments**: 18,498 |
| - **Unique downstream segments**: 9,936 |
| - **Average upstream parts**: 7.1 |
| - **Average downstream parts**: 3.7 |
|
|
| ### Sentinel visibility (EU-Hydro `River_Net_p` overlap ≥ 30 %) |
|
|
| | Strahler order | Facilities | % Sentinel-visible | |
| |---|---:|---:| |
| | 1 | 43,699 | 22.5 % | |
| | 2 | 28,113 | 20.5 % | |
| | 3 | 31,616 | 23.9 % | |
| | 4 | 24,961 | 42.5 % | |
| | 5 | 15,709 | 67.8 % | |
| | 6 | 8,128 | 86.5 % | |
| | 7 | 8,131 | 97.5 % | |
| | 8 | 219 | 100.0 % | |
|
|
| - **Facilities with `has_sentinel_visible_river = True`**: 59,568 / 160,576 (37.1 %) |
| - **Facilities where the *closest* reach is visible**: 23,507 / 160,576 (14.6 %) |
| |
| Lower-order rates (~20–25 %) are driven by upstream/downstream propagation: a headwater facility may drain into a wider river within the 10 km trace window. |
| |
| |
| ### `facility_timeseries.parquet` (210 MB) |
| |
| Sentinel-2 water-quality time series for **Sentinel-visible** industrial facilities (both upstream and downstream polygons detectable in 10 m imagery). Produced by fetching the Sentinel Hub Statistical API in P10D bins over 2017–2023 and merging three shards. One row per (facility, direction, 10-day bin). |
|
|
| | Column | Type | Description | |
| |--------|------|-------------| |
| | `facility_id` | int | Row index in `river_data_facilities.geoparquet` | |
| | `direction` | string | `"upstream"` or `"downstream"` | |
| | `polygon_hash` | string | SHA-256[:16] of the raw WKB polygon bytes (dedup key) | |
| | `date` | datetime | Start of the 10-day bin | |
| | `ndci_mean` | float | Mean NDCI over water pixels in bin | |
| | `ndci_stddev` | float | Std dev of NDCI | |
| | `ndci_n_valid` | int | Number of valid (water-masked) pixels | |
| | `turb_mean` | float | Mean turbidity proxy over water pixels | |
| | `turb_stddev` | float | Std dev of turbidity | |
| | `turb_n_valid` | int | Number of valid pixels (turbidity) | |
| | `ndwi_mean` | float | Mean NDWI (water index, quality check) | |
| | `ndwi_n_valid` | int | Number of valid pixels (NDWI) | |
|
|
| **Coverage:** 9.2 M rows · 23,158 unique facility IDs · 20,755 paired (both directions) · 2017-01-01 → 2023-12-16 |
|
|
| ### `facility_anomalies_per_bin.parquet` (216 MB) |
| |
| Per-bin anomaly detection output. One row per paired (facility, 10-day bin) where both upstream and downstream data exist. Produced by `scripts/compute_facility_anomalies.py`. |
| |
| Pipeline steps applied: |
| 1. Inner-join upstream + downstream on (facility_id, date) |
| 2. Pixel-count quality flags |
| 3. Raw downstream-minus-upstream delta |
| 4. **Spatial detrending**: subtract cross-facility median delta per date to remove regional Sentinel-2 artifacts |
| 5. Robust z-score per (facility_id, quarter) using median + MAD × 1.4826 |
| 6. Previous-bin z (persistence check) |
| 7. High-confidence anomaly flag (detrended delta > 0, z > 3, prev-z > 1.5) |
| |
| | Column | Type | Description | |
| |--------|------|-------------| |
| | `facility_id` | int | Facility identifier | |
| | `date` | datetime | 10-day bin start | |
| | `quarter` | int | Calendar quarter (1–4), used for seasonal baseline | |
| | `poly_hash_upstream` | string | Upstream polygon hash | |
| | `poly_hash_downstream` | string | Downstream polygon hash | |
| | `ndci_mean_upstream` / `_downstream` | float | NDCI means per direction | |
| | `ndci_n_valid_upstream` / `_downstream` | int | Valid pixel counts | |
| | `turb_mean_upstream` / `_downstream` | float | Turbidity means | |
| | `turb_n_valid_upstream` / `_downstream` | int | Valid pixel counts | |
| | `valid_bin_ndci` / `valid_bin_turb` | bool | Passes pixel-count quality filter | |
| | `delta_ndci_raw` | float | Raw downstream − upstream NDCI | |
| | `date_median_ndci` | float | Cross-facility median NDCI delta on this date (removed artifact) | |
| | `delta_ndci` | float | Spatially detrended NDCI delta | |
| | `delta_turb_raw` / `delta_turb` | float | Same for turbidity | |
| | `baseline_med_ndci` / `baseline_mad_ndci` | float | Seasonal baseline median and MAD | |
| | `z_delta_ndci` / `z_delta_turb` | float | Robust z-scores of detrended deltas | |
| | `z_delta_ndci_prev` / `z_delta_turb_prev` | float | Previous-bin z (persistence) | |
| | `low_baseline_data` | bool | True if < 8 bins in the seasonal group | |
| | `high_confidence_ndci` / `high_confidence_turb` | bool | Anomaly flag per signal | |
| | `any_anomaly` | bool | Either signal flagged | |
| | `event_key` | string | Links to event in `facility_anomalies_events.parquet` (null if not in a kept event) | |
|
|
| **Coverage:** 4.26 M rows · 20,755 facilities · 255 unique dates |
|
|
| ### `facility_anomalies_events.parquet` (tiny) |
|
|
| Consolidated pollution events — one row per unique (upstream polygon, downstream polygon, time window) after deduplication. Single-bin events and events where the downstream signal is not worse than upstream are excluded. |
|
|
| | Column | Type | Description | |
| |--------|------|-------------| |
| | `event_id` | string | Unique event key (e.g. `12345_e3`) | |
| | `facility_id` | int | Representative facility for this polygon pair | |
| | `start_date` | datetime | First flagged bin | |
| | `end_date` | datetime | Last flagged bin | |
| | `duration_bins` | int | Number of flagged 10-day bins | |
| | `peak_z_ndci` | float | Maximum z-score (NDCI) across bins in event | |
| | `peak_z_turb` | float | Maximum z-score (turbidity) across bins in event | |
| | `mean_z_ndci` / `mean_z_turb` | float | Mean z-scores over event | |
| | `signal_type` | string | `"ndci"`, `"turb"`, or `"both"` | |
| | `poly_hash_upstream` / `poly_hash_downstream` | string | Physical polygon pair (dedup key) | |
|
|
| **Coverage:** 42 events · 36 unique polygon pairs · 2017–2023 |
|
|
| **Thresholds used:** z > 3.0, prev-bin z > 1.5, ≥ 2 consecutive bins, detrended delta > 0, seasonal MAD baseline requires ≥ 8 bins per quarter. |
|
|
| ## License |
|
|
| CC-BY-4.0. See source datasets for their respective licenses. |
|
|
| ## Citation |
|
|
| If you use this dataset, please cite the source datasets: |
| - Lehner, B., Grill G. (2013): Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world's large river systems. Hydrological Processes, 27(15): 2171–2186. |
| - European Environment Agency (EEA) Industrial Emissions Database |
| - Copernicus EU-Hydro River Network Database |
|
|