What is the goal of Kaleidoscope? Increasing speed, quality/realism, or both?
Compared to Chroma v1: we know that Z Image is generally higher quality for realism than Klein, so Zeta-Chroma ought to be superior than Kaleidoscope for realism, so what's Kaleidoscope's aim, I wonder? As in, what will it mainly be better at than base Chroma, is it speed? Considerably? Quality of realism? Both?
And how will this compare to Radiance and its main goals?
as flux2 klein is also an edit model, it works similar, even tho the results are not the best but have the chroma concept variety
Train-ability is the biggest factor. Z-image trains terribly. Klein training projects (especially 9b) are really easy and the lora/checkpoints releasing are really good.
Compared to Chroma v1: we know that Z Image is generally higher quality for realism than Klein, so Zeta-Chroma ought to be superior than Kaleidoscope for realism, so what's Kaleidoscope's aim, I wonder? As in, what will it mainly be better at than base Chroma, is it speed? Considerably? Quality of realism? Both?
And how will this compare to Radiance and its main goals?
Maybe to be a better model?
I mean realism is... becoming a niche nobody needs anymore, since every model defaults to that. Just use ... literally any model for realism.
Compared to Chroma v1: we know that Z Image is generally higher quality for realism than Klein, so Zeta-Chroma ought to be superior than Kaleidoscope for realism, so what's Kaleidoscope's aim, I wonder? As in, what will it mainly be better at than base Chroma, is it speed? Considerably? Quality of realism? Both?
And how will this compare to Radiance and its main goals?
I think the goal of Kaleidoscope is everything what you wondered about it. Compared to Chroma 1, Kaleidoscope is more fast and inherits new aesthetics from Klein 4B. It just need some updates for you see how much this model is good. But yes, unfortunately, Kaleidoscope is based on Flux Klein 4B, which is technically worse than Klein 9B. So the Z-Image project (Zeta-Chroma) will be probably better than this one, because the prompt understanding is better, is more uncensored, and it's the full model.
Compared to Chroma v1: we know that Z Image is generally higher quality for realism than Klein, so Zeta-Chroma ought to be superior than Kaleidoscope for realism, so what's Kaleidoscope's aim, I wonder? As in, what will it mainly be better at than base Chroma, is it speed? Considerably? Quality of realism? Both?
And how will this compare to Radiance and its main goals?Maybe to be a better model?
I mean realism is... becoming a niche nobody needs anymore, since every model defaults to that. Just use ... literally any model for realism.
I wish that were the case but even a model as good at realism as Wan 2.2 has serious deficiencies in the realism it provides.
Compared to Chroma v1: we know that Z Image is generally higher quality for realism than Klein, so Zeta-Chroma ought to be superior than Kaleidoscope for realism, so what's Kaleidoscope's aim, I wonder? As in, what will it mainly be better at than base Chroma, is it speed? Considerably? Quality of realism? Both?
And how will this compare to Radiance and its main goals?Maybe to be a better model?
I mean realism is... becoming a niche nobody needs anymore, since every model defaults to that. Just use ... literally any model for realism.I wish that were the case but even a model as good at realism as Wan 2.2 has serious deficiencies in the realism it provides.
I mean that's a video model, so, no kidding. Pancakes and waffles.
It happens to do images better than most image models, at least for realism.
It happens to do images better than most image models, at least for realism.
On what planet lil bro. Like... what?
Sorry you want T5 and an abused video transformer? That's what gets you off? Qwen-Image is right over there and it has a text encoder that's worth a damn
Impress us by retraining Wan 2.2 to use your text encoder of choice. Otherwise, post with a modicum of maturity and professionalism. I am familiar with Qwen. I suggest refraining from posting wild assumptions and insipid flaming. It's also droll to see someone here, the context being a tiny model with a tiny model's inferior quality, arguing about Wan 2.2's realism in a churlish manner. Let me know when any model the size of this one rivals Wan 2.2's ability to do realism.