These are research artifacts accompanying the paper Native Ternary Quantization-Aware Training for Masked Diffusion Language Models. They are 341M-parameter masked-diffusion language models trained on Italian FineWeb-2 with a 32k SentencePiece tokenizer. This is not a production model. At roughly 12 tokens per parameter neither the ternary nor the full-precision model composes fluent text; free generation degenerates identically at both precisions. Use these checkpoints for reproduction, infilling analysis, and as paired baselines, not as downstream generators.
- Architecture: bidirectional masked-diffusion transformer,
d_model1024, 24 layers, 16 heads,d_ff2816, tied embeddings, 32001 vocabulary (mask token id 32000). - Format: bfloat16, verified to reproduce the full-precision evaluation within 0.0003 masked-CE of the fp32 master.
- Code and reproduction: https://github.com/lupodevelop/echo-1.58
- Tokenizer:
spm_it.model(included).
Evaluation (common protocol, sequence length 1024, identical seeded masks)
| 341M model | masked-CE | perplexity | vs FP16 twin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FP16 twin | 4.8100 | 122.7 | ceiling |
| Ternary baseline | 4.9852 | 146.2 | +19.2% |
| + continued distillation | 4.9125 | 136.0 | +10.8% |
| + from-scratch recipe | 4.9878 | 146.6 | +19.5% |
Echo-1.58 341M, Ternary, From-Scratch Recipe (Negative Control)
A ternary model trained from the first step with the full recovery recipe (distillation plus per-channel scale) for the full 4B-token budget. This is a released negative control. At 341M the recipe applied from step 0 recovers nothing measurable: the model lands at masked-CE 4.9878, within noise of the bare ternary baseline (4.9852), against the 70% recovery the identical recipe delivers at 27M. Post-hoc distillation scales; from-scratch distillation does not. Released because reproducible negative results are rarely shared and are useful for anyone studying scale-dependent distillation.
- Downloads last month
- 1