Qwen3.6-27B-AWQ-CT / README.md
mattbucci's picture
Refine variant recommendation: native is preferred for SGLang specifically, not all NVIDIA users
0ad7f50 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
1.86 kB
metadata
base_model: Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B
tags:
  - compressed-tensors
  - 4-bit
  - dense
  - deltanet
  - thinking
  - vision
  - multimodal
  - rdna4
  - rocm
  - sglang
  - quantized
license: apache-2.0

Qwen3.6-27B AWQ 4-bit (compressed-tensors)

Compressed-tensors output of GPTQ calibration of Qwen3.6-27B with thinking + vision preserved.

Which variant should I download?

Stack Recommended Why
SGLang + ROCm Native AWQ Faster on the fused Triton AWQ GEMM than the ROCm CT MoE path
SGLang + NVIDIA Native AWQ Avoids the same Qwen3_5Moe CT loader bug seen on 35B (not yet confirmed on 27B but same code path)
vLLM / autoawq / TGI on NVIDIA Either works CT loaders in those engines handle the gate correctly
Inspection / re-conversion This (CT) Raw GPTQ output from llmcompressor before AWQ repack

Model Details

Base model Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B
Architecture Qwen3.5 dense+DeltaNet hybrid + vision tower
Parameters 27B
Format compressed-tensors pack-quantized (W4A16, group_size=128)
Calibration GPTQ via llmcompressor, 256 samples × 1024 tokens, thinking_vision recipe

For ignore list and benchmark numbers see the native variant's README.

Convert to native AWQ

git clone https://github.com/mattbucci/2x-R9700-RDNA4-GFX1201-sglang-inference
python scripts/quantize/convert_moe_ct_to_awq.py <local_path_to_this_repo> <output_dir> --group-size 128

Hardware origin

Calibrated on 2× AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 (gfx1201, RDNA4) with ROCm 7.2 + SGLang v0.5.10 + RDNA4 patches.