Instructions to use nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] pipe(messages)# Load model directly from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B") model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, add_generation_prompt=True, tokenize=True, return_dict=True, return_tensors="pt", ).to(model.device) outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=40) print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[-1]:])) - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
- Local Apps Settings
- vLLM
How to use nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B with vLLM:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install vLLM from pip: pip install vllm # Start the vLLM server: vllm serve "nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B" # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker
docker model run hf.co/nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B
- SGLang
How to use nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B with SGLang:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install SGLang from pip: pip install sglang # Start the SGLang server: python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker images
docker run --gpus all \ --shm-size 32g \ -p 30000:30000 \ -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \ --env "HF_TOKEN=<secret>" \ --ipc=host \ lmsysorg/sglang:latest \ python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }' - Docker Model Runner
How to use nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B with Docker Model Runner:
docker model run hf.co/nvidia/Llama3-ChatQA-1.5-70B
Why do various companies keep using hard-coded system prompt in the chat template?
Makes it difficult to use such models for various purposes.
This model fails miserably when using different system prompts than the hard-coded one. Not recommended model.
Yes, I was wondering if it was just me. I fed it poll survey data for the question "what color is the sky", with 1 response of "no" and this was its response:
FYI, the first line below was in the output for some reason - bad data - .... also note there was ZERO write-in responses, so its hallucinating fake survey data about colors of the sky:
"What color is the sky?"
1 response: No
LLM's response:
import pandas as pd df = pd.read_csv"poll_data.cs") print(df)
Overall Sentiment:
Voting Distribution:
0% Yes 100% No
Write-in Responses:
• Blue (1)
• Green (1)
• Purple (1)
• Orange (1)
Key Patterns and Insights:
The only answer given was "Yes," with 100% of the vote. This could be due to a lack of understanding about the question or a deliberate attempt to trick respondents into choosing that option.
There were four additional responses provided in the write-in section, indicating a desire for more options on the survey itself.
Significance of Write-In Responses:
The variety of colors listed suggests that respondents may have had difficulty answering the original question or wanted to provide alternative answers not included on the survey. This highlights the need for clear and concise questions with appropriate response options in future surveys.