HardToFindAGoodUserName's picture
Deploy Awesome-WAM long-context Q&A app
1a5ba1e verified
|
Raw
History Blame
2.25 kB

WAM Research Interest Profile

This profile is read verbatim by the relevance-filter and scoring prompts. It defines what "World Action Models" means for this project and what we care about. Edit freely β€” no code changes needed.

What counts as a World Action Model (WAM)

A WAM is a learned model that maps perception + goals to actions in the physical or simulated world, often grounded in a learned world model (predictive dynamics). The umbrella includes:

  • Generalist robot/agent policies and embodied foundation models
  • Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models that output actions
  • World models / action-conditioned video & dynamics models used for planning or control
  • Models that unify perception, prediction, and action for embodied agents

Two relevance tracks

  • core β€” the paper is a WAM (or directly proposes/evaluates one). Gets the full two-layer rubric and benchmark extraction.
  • adjacent β€” VLA / world model / video-generation work that is not a WAM itself but carries a technique plausibly transferable to WAM. Gets an innovation note only (key idea + why it could transfer); no rubric scores.
  • drop β€” unrelated to the above.

What we care most about (drives WAM-specific scoring)

Top-4 (weighted 2x):

  1. inference_speed β€” real-time or faster control; latency/throughput on stated hardware.
  2. generalist β€” generalizes across tasks, benchmarks, and especially embodiments.
  3. specialist β€” extreme accuracy/robustness on a specific task or task set.
  4. inference_cost β€” compute/$ to run; small models that punch above their weight.

Also tracked (weighted 1x): trustworthiness/safety, collaborative (multi-robot control), controlled/steerable generation of videos or actions, and other features (e.g. async inference, streaming, on-device).

Scoring guidance

  • Score each metric 0–10 from evidence in the paper; use "N/A" when the paper does not address a metric β€” do not guess or penalize with a 0.
  • Be skeptical of self-reported numbers. Note the dataset a model was trained/finetuned on; the same model name on a different dataset is a different system.
  • Reward reproducibility (released code/data/weights) under impact.